↓ Skip to main content

Methamphetamine administration increases hepatic CYP1A2 but not CYP3A activity in female guinea pigs

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Methamphetamine administration increases hepatic CYP1A2 but not CYP3A activity in female guinea pigs
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2020
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0233010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 41%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Sports and Recreations 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 11 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,889,055
of 24,067,703 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,375
of 206,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,390
of 390,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,118
of 2,873 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,067,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,873 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.