↓ Skip to main content

Wild alternatives: Accounting for and rethinking the relationship between wild game and food security in Appalachian food systems

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Geography, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Wild alternatives: Accounting for and rethinking the relationship between wild game and food security in Appalachian food systems
Published in
Applied Geography, November 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102329
Authors

Jonathan C. Hall, Heidi Gum, Kaleb Pietkoski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Linguistics 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,335,022
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Applied Geography
#316
of 1,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,290
of 441,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Geography
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.