↓ Skip to main content

Adult macronutrient intake and physical capability in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development

Overview of attention for article published in Age & Ageing, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adult macronutrient intake and physical capability in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development
Published in
Age & Ageing, August 2012
DOI 10.1093/ageing/afs101
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

poor physical capability is associated with higher subsequent risk of disability and mortality in older people. Energy and macronutrient intakes may play a role in the maintenance of physical capability. This analysis aimed to examine the role of intakes of energy and the macronutrients, protein, carbohydrate and fat in early and mid-adulthood on objective measures of physical capability in later adulthood in the MRC National Survey of Health and Development (1946 British birth cohort).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 65 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 28%
Social Sciences 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 23 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2012.
All research outputs
#22,411,758
of 34,575,175 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#3,760
of 4,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,536
of 224,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#26
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,575,175 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.