You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Significance of silicon uptake, transport, and deposition in plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Botany, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jxb/eraa301 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rushil Mandlik, Vandana Thakral, Gaurav Raturi, Suhas Shinde, Miroslav Nikolić, Durgesh K Tripathi, Humira Sonah, Rupesh Deshmukh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Brazil | 2 | 22% |
| India | 1 | 11% |
| Colombia | 1 | 11% |
| Peru | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 140 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 60 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 59 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#6,285,337
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Botany
#2,242
of 6,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,967
of 399,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Botany
#50
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.