Title |
Diagnosis of physical and mental health conditions in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
The Lancet Public Health, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30201-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Richard Williams, David A Jenkins, Darren M Ashcroft, Ben Brown, Stephen Campbell, Matthew J Carr, Sudeh Cheraghi-sohi, Navneet Kapur, Owain Thomas, Roger T Webb, Niels Peek |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 173 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 64 | 37% |
United States | 17 | 10% |
Spain | 7 | 4% |
Australia | 3 | 2% |
Nigeria | 3 | 2% |
Switzerland | 2 | 1% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 69 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 121 | 70% |
Scientists | 26 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 386 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 58 | 15% |
Student > Master | 45 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 43 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 4% |
Other | 50 | 13% |
Unknown | 146 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 22% |
Psychology | 34 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 2% |
Other | 56 | 15% |
Unknown | 150 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2023.
All research outputs
#14,213
of 25,956,379 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Public Health
#38
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#623
of 432,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Public Health
#3
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,956,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 159.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.