↓ Skip to main content

Prion protein degradation by lichens of the genus Cladonia

Overview of attention for article published in Lichenologist, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prion protein degradation by lichens of the genus Cladonia
Published in
Lichenologist, June 2012
DOI 10.1017/s0024282912000102
Authors

James P. BENNETT, Cynthia M. RODRIGUEZ, Christopher J. JOHNSON

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 30%
Unspecified 1 10%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Lichenologist
#91
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,734
of 180,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lichenologist
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.