Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is not a diagnostic entity

Overview of attention for article published in Histopathology, December 2020

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 5 X users

guideline: 1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley: 7 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 7 X posts from 5 X users, with an upper bound of 21,723 followers.

Just published in January 2021 issue @Histo_Journal (PMID: 32970871) Great insights from Dr. Delahunt and colleagues! Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is not a diagnostic entity https://t.co/PFMAU5TfiU #gupath #prostatecancer #urology #pathology

RT @Gleason4plus5: Another editorial in @Histo_Journal regarding the multiple controversies surrounding intraductal prostate cancer. Much o…

Another editorial in @Histo_Journal regarding the multiple controversies surrounding intraductal prostate cancer. Much of the debate surrounds the issue of whether IDC ever occurs in the absence of GG2 or higher tumor. #gupath https://t.co/Gtdi9Xf6eV

Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate is not a diagnostic entity https://t.co/3FzQ1xNoO4

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 3 additional X posts.