↓ Skip to main content

Inequalities in complete childhood immunisation in Nepal: results from a population-based cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inequalities in complete childhood immunisation in Nepal: results from a population-based cross-sectional study
Published in
BMJ Open, September 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037646
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Master 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 36 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 35 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#15,751,285
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#16,962
of 25,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,514
of 430,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#549
of 847 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 847 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.