↓ Skip to main content

Erythema Migrans

Overview of attention for article published in The American Journal of Dermatopathology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Erythema Migrans
Published in
The American Journal of Dermatopathology, December 2012
DOI 10.1097/dad.0b013e31825879be
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Early cutaneous Lyme disease, erythema migrans, manifests as a gyrate erythema at the site of a tick bite. The standard histopathologic description is that of a superficial and deep perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate in which plasma cells are identified at the periphery of the lesion and eosinophils in the center. Deviation from these commonly accepted histopathologic findings may lead to an erroneous diagnosis. Herein, we describe 4 cases of erythema migrans, all biopsied at the periphery of the lesion and confirmed by serologic studies, demonstrating a variety of unconventional histopathologic patterns. These findings include eosinophils and neutrophils at the periphery of the expanding annular plaque of erythema migrans, focal interface change, spongiosis, involvement of the superficial vascular plexus alone, and an absence of plasma cells in all cases. These cases highlight the varied and nonspecific histopathologic changes that can be seen in erythema migrans, including the absence of plasma cells and the presence of focal interface change. Based on these findings, the dermatopathologist should always consider erythema migrans as a diagnostic possibility in a biopsy specimen from an expanding gyrate or annular erythema despite the presence of unusual features. In atypical clinical cases, serologic confirmation may be required for diagnosis in the presence of histopathologic findings considered unconventional for erythema migrans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 26%
Other 4 17%
Librarian 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 61%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 9%
Philosophy 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#9,098,886
of 27,362,573 outputs
Outputs from The American Journal of Dermatopathology
#310
of 1,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,129
of 294,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The American Journal of Dermatopathology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,362,573 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,858 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.