↓ Skip to main content

Regulatory issues in immunity to liver and blood-stage malaria

Overview of attention for article published in Current Opinion in Immunology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Regulatory issues in immunity to liver and blood-stage malaria
Published in
Current Opinion in Immunology, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.coi.2016.06.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

T cells play a major role in control of both blood and liver stage of plasmodium infection. While immunization with certain attenuated whole-parasite vaccines that are attenuated at the liver stage of the infection induces protective T cell responses, even multiple exposures to natural infection in endemic areas do not lead to stable T cell memory or humoral immunity and sterilizing protection. One of the key differences between vaccination and natural exposure is the absence of blood stage during vaccination. Here we will discuss possible immunoregulatory strategies employed by blood stage of malaria leading to generation of severely compromised T cell and humoral immune responses and subsequent lack of sterilizing immunity.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Current Opinion in Immunology
#1,816
of 2,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,351
of 367,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Opinion in Immunology
#23
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,021 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.