| Title |
The ventilation of buildings and other mitigating measures for COVID-19: a focus on wintertime
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspa.2020.0855 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henry C. Burridge, Rajesh K. Bhagat, Marc E. J. Stettler, Prashant Kumar, Ishanki De Mel, Panagiotis Demis, Allen Hart, Yyanis Johnson-Llambias, Marco-Felipe King, Oleksiy Klymenko, Alison McMillan, Piotr Morawiecki, Thomas Pennington, Michael Short, David Sykes, Philippe H. Trinh, Stephen K. Wilson, Clint Wong, Hayley Wragg, Megan S. Davies Wykes, Chris Iddon, Andrew W. Woods, Nicola Mingotti, Neeraja Bhamidipati, Huw Woodward, Clive Beggs, Hywel Davies, Shaun Fitzgerald, Christopher Pain, P. F. Linden |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 41 | 41% |
| United States | 7 | 7% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 68 | 68% |
| Scientists | 27 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 256 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 10% |
| Unknown | 156 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 32 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 34 | 13% |
| Unknown | 165 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 231. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2023.
All research outputs
#207,878
of 34,378,656 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
#34
of 2,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,094
of 496,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,378,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.