@ophello @0x_impai @CFS_energy AI generated reply? really? it's also wrong btw. SPARC is obviouslly a solid-walled system and no sane person would ever use a liquid blanket because it poisons the plasma and introduces a complicated uncontained fluid co…
@Archophob1 @NoahRettberg Äh: ”1997 JET set the record for the closest approach to scientific breakeven, reaching Q = 0.67 in 1997” SPARC soll konservativ mindestens Q > 2 erreichen. Und vor allem: “commercially relevant” https://t.co/VMhBqyzo7i …
@Goolic @BenShindel @andrewmccalip @CFS_energy For SPARC our definition of Q is this: "Fusion gain is defined as the fusion power generated in the plasma divided by the external heating power absorbed in the plasma, including ohmic power.” https://t.co/l…
RT @emulenews: #JournalPlasmaPhysics Overview of the SPARC tokamak https://t.co/fzcdezeIQU "SPARC is designed as a high-field (B0=12.2 T),…