↓ Skip to main content

An exploration of the collaborative processes of making theatre inspired by science

Overview of attention for article published in Public Understanding of Science, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An exploration of the collaborative processes of making theatre inspired by science
Published in
Public Understanding of Science, February 2011
DOI 10.1177/0963662510394278
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen Dowell, Emma Weitkamp

Abstract

This research examined the collaborative processes of making theatre inspired by science through the analysis of 16 semi-structured interviews with individual collaborators (eight theatre practitioners and eight scientists). Interviews explored experiences, including their motivations, working processes, challenges, learning and understanding. Roles of scientists in the collaboration ranged from expert advisor to equal creative collaborator. Factors affecting partnerships included curiosity for each other's practice, social interaction and mutual respect. The research suggests that scientists could be motivated to undertake 'Sci-Art' collaborations through personal interest, as well as previously identified motives such as encouragement from their department. The project also identified benefits to researchers from such collaborations, including developing new perspectives on their own practice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Australia 3 4%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 63 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 16 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 21 30%
Environmental Science 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,947,345
of 27,450,555 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#969
of 1,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,610
of 127,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,450,555 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.