| Title |
An exploration of the collaborative processes of making theatre inspired by science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Understanding of Science, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1177/0963662510394278 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ellen Dowell, Emma Weitkamp |
| Abstract |
This research examined the collaborative processes of making theatre inspired by science through the analysis of 16 semi-structured interviews with individual collaborators (eight theatre practitioners and eight scientists). Interviews explored experiences, including their motivations, working processes, challenges, learning and understanding. Roles of scientists in the collaboration ranged from expert advisor to equal creative collaborator. Factors affecting partnerships included curiosity for each other's practice, social interaction and mutual respect. The research suggests that scientists could be motivated to undertake 'Sci-Art' collaborations through personal interest, as well as previously identified motives such as encouragement from their department. The project also identified benefits to researchers from such collaborations, including developing new perspectives on their own practice. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |