↓ Skip to main content

Large wind ripples on Mars: A record of atmospheric evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
4 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large wind ripples on Mars: A record of atmospheric evolution
Published in
Science, July 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aaf3206
Pubmed ID
Authors

M G A Lapotre, R C Ewing, M P Lamb, W W Fischer, J P Grotzinger, D M Rubin, K W Lewis, M J Ballard, M Day, S Gupta, S G Banham, N T Bridges, D J Des Marais, A A Fraeman, J A Grant, K E Herkenhoff, D W Ming, M A Mischna, M S Rice, D Y Sumner, A R Vasavada, R A Yingst

Abstract

Wind blowing over sand on Earth produces decimeter-wavelength ripples and hundred-meter- to kilometer-wavelength dunes: bedforms of two distinct size modes. Observations from the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity rover and the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter reveal that Mars hosts a third stable wind-driven bedform, with meter-scale wavelengths. These bedforms are spatially uniform in size and typically have asymmetric profiles with angle-of-repose lee slopes and sinuous crest lines, making them unlike terrestrial wind ripples. Rather, these structures resemble fluid-drag ripples, which on Earth include water-worked current ripples, but on Mars instead form by wind because of the higher kinematic viscosity of the low-density atmosphere. A reevaluation of the wind-deposited strata in the Burns formation (about 3.7 billion years old or younger) identifies potential wind-drag ripple stratification formed under a thin atmosphere.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 117 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 27 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 49 41%
Physics and Astronomy 13 11%
Environmental Science 7 6%
Engineering 7 6%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 32 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 337. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#95,965
of 25,109,675 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,165
of 80,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,034
of 360,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#54
of 1,000 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,000 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.