↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Introducing Hematoma Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy in a Surgical Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of Introducing Hematoma Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy in a Surgical Practice
Published in
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, May 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.04.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Preoperative needle localization (NL) is the gold standard for lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer. Hematoma ultrasound-guided (HUG) lumpectomy can offer several advantages. The purpose of this study was to compare the use of HUG with NL lumpectomy in a single surgical practice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Student > Master 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 28%
Engineering 3 17%
Computer Science 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#3,376
of 4,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,611
of 177,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#37
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.