↓ Skip to main content

What are we measuring with the morningness–eveningness questionnaire? Exploratory factor analysis across four samples from two countries

Overview of attention for article published in Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
What are we measuring with the morningness–eveningness questionnaire? Exploratory factor analysis across four samples from two countries
Published in
Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, September 2020
DOI 10.1080/07420528.2020.1815758
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Professor 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 43 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 44 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#7,303,472
of 34,378,656 outputs
Outputs from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#574
of 1,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,327
of 465,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,378,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,696 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.