↓ Skip to main content

Marijuana Use and Risky Sexual Behavior Among High-Risk Adolescents: Trajectories, Risk Factors, and Event-Level Relationships

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Psychology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Marijuana Use and Risky Sexual Behavior Among High-Risk Adolescents: Trajectories, Risk Factors, and Event-Level Relationships
Published in
Developmental Psychology, September 2012
DOI 10.1037/a0027547
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Adolescents involved with the juvenile justice system have a high incidence of risky sexual behaviors resulting in unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections. Substance use may be particularly important as a risk factor for unsafe sexual behavior for this group, and recent evidence suggests a possible association between marijuana use and risky sexual behavior. Adolescents (n = 728; 33% female) on probation were followed for 2 years, at intervals of 6 months, to explore the association of marijuana use and condom use longitudinally and at a specific intercourse occasion. Latent growth curve modeling indicated that greater marijuana use at baseline was associated with a steeper decline in condom use over the 2-year period of the study. In-depth analysis of the most recent intercourse occasion suggested that condom use was less likely if marijuana was being used by the participant or his/her partner and that this association was more pronounced if intercourse occurred with someone the participant had just met. Implications for the prevention of risky sexual behavior in this population are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 170 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 15%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 31 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 17%
Social Sciences 20 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,088,314
of 33,009,949 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Psychology
#2,450
of 4,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,219
of 217,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Psychology
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,009,949 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.