↓ Skip to main content

Reflections: Spirituality and Cancer Researchers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cancer Education, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Reflections: Spirituality and Cancer Researchers
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13187-016-1072-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Spirituality is increasingly acknowledged as an essential element to consider within care for cancer and other chronic health conditions. As our colleagues in frontline healthcare roles integrate these concepts into their professional practice, it seems timely for the cancer research community to reflect on the place of spirituality within our work. This reflections article discusses challenges and opportunities for researchers considering spirituality in their own work roles and within broader discussions about health needs, care and research agendas.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 17%
Lecturer 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 10 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2019.
All research outputs
#15,379,760
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#609
of 1,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,767
of 351,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#14
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.