↓ Skip to main content

Gabapentin for refractory chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
312 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Gabapentin for refractory chronic cough: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Published in
The Lancet, August 2012
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60776-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 104 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 312 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 302 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 69 22%
Researcher 53 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 5%
Professor 16 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 5%
Other 66 21%
Unknown 75 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 166 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 17 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 83 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2025.
All research outputs
#470,687
of 34,566,597 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#4,341
of 52,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,083
of 225,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#24
of 468 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,566,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 468 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.