| Title |
Case Series of Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults Associated with SARS-CoV-2 Infection — United Kingdom and United States, March–August 2020
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm6940e1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sapna Bamrah Morris, Noah G. Schwartz, Pragna Patel, Lilian Abbo, Laura Beauchamps, Shuba Balan, Ellen H. Lee, Rachel Paneth-Pollak, Anita Geevarughese, Maura K. Lash, Marie S. Dorsinville, Vennus Ballen, Daniel P. Eiras, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Emer Smith, Sara Robinson, Patricia Stogsdill, Sarah Lim, Sharon E. Fox, Gillian Richardson, Julie Hand, Nora T. Oliver, Aaron Kofman, Bobbi Bryant, Zachary Ende, Deblina Datta, Ermias Belay, Shana Godfred-Cato |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 544 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 150 | 28% |
| Japan | 32 | 6% |
| Canada | 15 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 2% |
| Spain | 8 | 1% |
| Mexico | 6 | 1% |
| Australia | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 50 | 9% |
| Unknown | 258 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 456 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 40 | 7% |
| Scientists | 33 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 3% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 490 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 490 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 59 | 12% |
| Other | 51 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 87 | 18% |
| Unknown | 179 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 183 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 9% |
| Unknown | 196 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1472. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#9,983
of 34,637,917 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#265
of 5,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#382
of 469,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#23
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,637,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 275.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.