Current proteomic techniques allow researchers to analyze chosen biological pathways or an ensemble of related protein complexes at a global level via the measure of physical protein-protein interactions by affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS). Such experiments yield information-rich but complex interaction maps whose unbiased interpretation is challenging. Guided by current knowledge on the modular structure of protein complexes, we propose a novel statistical approach, named BI-MAP, complemented by software tools and a visual grammar to present the inferred modules. We show that the BI-MAP tools can be applied from small and very detailed maps to large, sparse, and much noisier data sets. The BI-MAP tool implementation and test data are made freely available.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2013.
All research outputs
#23,274,274
of 32,742,468 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Proteome Research
#5,570
of 7,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,625
of 204,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Proteome Research
#38
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,742,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
