↓ Skip to main content

An Inordinate Fondness for Eukaryotic Diversity

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Biology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An Inordinate Fondness for Eukaryotic Diversity
Published in
PLoS Biology, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001382
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Why do some groups of organisms, like beetles, have so many species, and others, like the tuataras, so few? This classic question in evolutionary biology has a deep history and has been studied using both fossils and phylogenetic trees. Phylogeny-based studies have focused on tree balance, which compares the number of species across clades of the same age in the tree. These studies have suggested that rates of speciation and extinction vary tremendously across the tree of life. In this issue, Rabosky et al. report the most ambitious study to date on the differences in species diversity across clades in the tree of life. The authors bring together a tremendously large dataset of multicellular eukaryotes, including all living species of plants, animals, and fungi; they divide these organisms into 1,397 clades, accounting for more than 1.2 million species in total. Rabosky et al. find tremendous variation in diversity across the tree of life. There are old clades with few species, young clades with many species, and everything in between. They also note a peculiar aspect of their data: it is difficult or impossible to predict how many species will be found in a particular clade knowing how long a clade has been diversifying from a common ancestor. This pattern suggests complex dynamics of speciation and extinction in the history of eukaryotes. Rabosky et al.'s paper represents the latest development in our efforts to understand the Earth's biodiversity at the broadest scales.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 6 6%
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 3 3%
France 3 3%
Portugal 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 75 77%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 21 22%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 76 78%
Environmental Science 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 10 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,804,579
of 34,151,039 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Biology
#2,492
of 7,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,688
of 224,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Biology
#9
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,151,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.