↓ Skip to main content

Killing for conservation: the need for alternatives to lethal sampling of apex predatory sharks

Overview of attention for article published in Endangered Species Research, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Killing for conservation: the need for alternatives to lethal sampling of apex predatory sharks
Published in
Endangered Species Research, June 2011
DOI 10.3354/esr00354
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
United States 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Unknown 182 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 21%
Student > Bachelor 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Student > Master 29 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 3%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 51%
Environmental Science 31 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Philosophy 2 1%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 39 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,012,923
of 28,812,439 outputs
Outputs from Endangered Species Research
#228
of 919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,903
of 137,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Endangered Species Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,812,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 919 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.