The Intrepid Dynamic Exoskeletal Orthosis (IDEO) is an ankle-foot orthosis developed to address the high rates of delayed amputation in the military. Its use has enabled many wounded Service Members to run again. During running, stiffness is thought to influence an orthosis' energy storage and return mechanical properties. This study examined the effect of orthosis stiffness on running biomechanics in patients with lower limb impairments who had undergone unilateral limb salvage.
Ten patients with lower limb impairments underwent gait analysis at a self-selected running velocity. 1. Nominal (clinically-prescribed), 2. Stiff (20% stiffer than nominal), and 3. Compliant (20% less stiff than nominal) ankle-foot orthosis stiffnesses were tested.
Ankle joint stiffness was greatest in the stiffest strut and lowest in the compliant strut, however ankle mechanical work remained unchanged. Speed, stride length, cycle time, joint angles, moments, powers, and ground reaction forces were not significantly different among stiffness conditions. Ankle joint kinematics and ankle, knee and hip kinetics were different between limbs. Ankle power, in particular, was lower in the injured limb.
Ankle-foot orthosis stiffness affected ankle joint stiffness but did not influence other biomechanical parameters of running in individuals with unilateral limb salvage. Foot strike asymmetries may have influenced the kinetics of running. Therefore, a range of stiffness may be clinically appropriate when prescribing ankle-foot orthoses for active individuals with limb salvage.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biomechanics
#1,719
of 2,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,162
of 276,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biomechanics
#37
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,241 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
