↓ Skip to main content

Burn prevention mechanisms and outcomes: Pitfalls, failures and successes

Overview of attention for article published in Burns (03054179), October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Burn prevention mechanisms and outcomes: Pitfalls, failures and successes
Published in
Burns (03054179), October 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2008.06.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 289 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 13%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Bachelor 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 6%
Other 70 24%
Unknown 68 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 8%
Social Sciences 21 7%
Psychology 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 77 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2020.
All research outputs
#24,752,513
of 34,359,530 outputs
Outputs from Burns (03054179)
#2,121
of 2,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,008
of 145,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns (03054179)
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,359,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.