You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimal Cut-Off of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity According to the New Definition of Pulmonary Hypertension ― Its Use in Predicting Pulmonary Hypertension ―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Reports, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circrep.cr-20-0094 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Keiko Sumimoto, Hidekazu Tanaka, Jun Mukai, Kentaro Yamashita, Yusuke Tanaka, Ayu Shono, Makiko Suzuki, Shun Yokota, Kensuke Matsumoto, Yu Taniguchi, Noriaki Emoto, Ken-Ichi Hirata |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2021.
All research outputs
#16,059,145
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Reports
#150
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,719
of 429,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Reports
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.