↓ Skip to main content

Program Evaluation for Health Professionals: What It Is, What It Isn’t and How to Do It

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Qualitative Methods, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Program Evaluation for Health Professionals: What It Is, What It Isn’t and How to Do It
Published in
International Journal of Qualitative Methods, October 2020
DOI 10.1177/1609406920964345
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 181 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Researcher 13 7%
Lecturer 7 4%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 103 57%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 10%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 106 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,161,311
of 27,696,488 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Qualitative Methods
#391
of 1,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,947
of 443,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Qualitative Methods
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,696,488 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.