↓ Skip to main content

Can risk factors, clinical history and symptoms be used to predict risk of ectopic pregnancy in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit?

Overview of attention for article published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can risk factors, clinical history and symptoms be used to predict risk of ectopic pregnancy in women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit?
Published in
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, November 2016
DOI 10.1002/uog.16007
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Ayim, S. Tapp, S. Guha, L. Ameye, M. Al-Memar, A. Sayasneh, C. Bottomley, D. Gould, C. Stalder, D. Timmerman, T. Bourne

Abstract

We aimed to examine whether risk factors and symptoms may be used to predict the likelihood of EP in women attending early pregnancy assessment units in the UK. Prospective observational cohort study. Pregnant women under 12 weeks gestation were recruited in three London university hospitals between August 2012 and April 2013. One hospital continued the recruitment between January and June 2015. A standardized information sheet incorporating patient demographics, past medical history and symptoms was completed by patients and confirmed by examining clinicians. The outcome was final pregnancy location. There were 1320 eligible patients with a total of 72 EP (rate 5.5%). Pelvic pain and diarrhoea >3 times in the previous 24 hrs were independent symptoms that increased the risk of EP: relative risk 2.4 (95% CI, 1.4 to 4.0), and 2.2 (95% CI 1.08 to 4.5) respectively (p-values 0.002 and 0.03). The only other independent marker of risk was duration of bleeding; the risk of EP increased 20% (95% CI, 14% to 27%) for every one-day increment (p < 0.001). A logistic regression model incorporating these factors, demonstrated an area under the ROC curve of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67 to 0.79). The prevalence of EP was low when there was no pelvic pain, no diarrhoea and the duration of bleeding ≤3 days: EP rate of 1.5% (6/391). When a single symptom was present, the EP rate increased to 5% (29/631), for two risk factors 8% (1/12) and three risk factors 9% (9/103), respectively. Women with pelvic pain and vaginal bleeding of any severity for >3 days had a high EP rate of 16% (23/146). In the nine women who also reported diarrhoea >3 times in the previous 24 hrs, two were EPs. Only the presence or absence of pain, presence or absence of diarrhoea >3 times in the previous 24 hrs, and duration of bleeding were symptoms that significantly increased the risk for EP in women attending early pregnancy units. Risk factors and symptoms alone could not be used to reliably predict women who have EP.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#16,714,238
of 28,757,281 outputs
Outputs from Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
#2,627
of 3,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,993
of 316,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology
#27
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,757,281 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.