↓ Skip to main content

Enzymes of Epigenetics, Volume 573

Overview of attention for book
Enzymes of Epigenetics, Volume 573
Academic Press
Attention for Chapter: Enzymes of Epigenetics, Part A
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Chapter title
Enzymes of Epigenetics, Part A
Book title
Enzymes of Epigenetics, Part A
Published in
Methods in enzymology, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.03.010
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-12-805365-2
Authors

Lai, F, Blumenthal, E, Shiekhattar, R, F. Lai, E. Blumenthal, R. Shiekhattar

Abstract

Recent genome-wide studies have yielded new insights into the biological function of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), predominantly through analysis of their genomic addresses. These studies have revealed that a large number of lncRNAs map to regulatory elements in eukaryotic genome regions known as promoter and enhancer elements. Here, we review the principles of current methodologies for analyzing lncRNAs with high-throughput sequencing approaches. These include (1) direct RNA sequencing, (2) sequencing coupled with transcription, and (3) isolation of protein complexes associated with lncRNAs followed by high-throughput sequencing. Within these categories, we also describe detailed protocols for chromatin-associated RNA sequencing, nascent transcript Global run-on sequencing, and photoactivatable ribonucleoside-enhanced cross-linking and immunoprecipitation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 29%
Researcher 9 29%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 29%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#17,487,661
of 28,879,505 outputs
Outputs from Methods in enzymology
#1,823
of 2,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,948
of 410,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in enzymology
#48
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,879,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,897 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.