↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Use of Decision Models in the Development of Evidence-Based Clinical Preventive Services Recommendations: Methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, July 2016
DOI 10.7326/m15-2531
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2024.
All research outputs
#865,410
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#2,645
of 16,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,657
of 337,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#42
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.