| Title |
COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 25th Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) Workgroup
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Nephrology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41581-020-00356-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mitra K. Nadim, Lui G. Forni, Ravindra L. Mehta, Michael J. Connor, Kathleen D. Liu, Marlies Ostermann, Thomas Rimmelé, Alexander Zarbock, Samira Bell, Azra Bihorac, Vincenzo Cantaluppi, Eric Hoste, Faeq Husain-Syed, Michael J. Germain, Stuart L. Goldstein, Shruti Gupta, Michael Joannidis, Kianoush Kashani, Jay L. Koyner, Matthieu Legrand, Nuttha Lumlertgul, Sumit Mohan, Neesh Pannu, Zhiyong Peng, Xose L. Perez-Fernandez, Peter Pickkers, John Prowle, Thiago Reis, Nattachai Srisawat, Ashita Tolwani, Anitha Vijayan, Gianluca Villa, Li Yang, Claudio Ronco, John A. Kellum |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 246 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 43 | 17% |
| United States | 17 | 7% |
| Spain | 9 | 4% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Colombia | 5 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Senegal | 4 | 2% |
| Argentina | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 55 | 22% |
| Unknown | 94 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 200 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 11% |
| Scientists | 15 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 725 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 725 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 70 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 66 | 9% |
| Researcher | 55 | 8% |
| Other | 54 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 6% |
| Other | 137 | 19% |
| Unknown | 298 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 249 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 69 | 10% |
| Unknown | 318 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 306. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2026.
All research outputs
#142,823
of 34,641,161 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Nephrology
#28
of 2,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,400
of 469,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Nephrology
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,641,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 469,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.