↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Biofilm production among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from catheterized patients with urinary tract infection
Published in
Microbial Pathogenesis, June 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.micpath.2016.06.031
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Between June 2011 and May 2014, we isolated a total of 419 S. aureus strains from catheterized patients with UTI in a referral hospital in Tehran. Of these, 108 were identified as methicillin resistant (MRSA) based on their phenotypic resistance to oxacillin and the presence of mecA gene. The MRSA isolates were tested for their clonality using a combination of PFGE, prophage typing, SCCmec and ccr typing and examined for their biofilm formation as well as their resistance against 17 antibiotics. In all, 15 common pulsotypes consisted of 105 isolates and 3 single types were identified among the MRSA strains of which, 97% carried SCCmec type III and type 3 ccr. Eighty three (77%) strains were positive for biofilm formation and also carried icaA and icaD genes. Moreover, agr group III and its related tst gene were detected in 77% of biofilm producing strains. 105 of the 108 MRSA were multidrug resistant with 72.3% being resistant to more than 10 antibiotics. Strains with SCCmec type IV and type 2 ccr, contained SGA and SGL prophage types, were positive for pvl gene and belonged to single PFGE types. This study highlights the important role of biofilm formation and virulence factors of MRSA strains in catheterized patients.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Engineering 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2025.
All research outputs
#8,187,104
of 28,174,454 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Pathogenesis
#581
of 3,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,251
of 319,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Pathogenesis
#13
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,174,454 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,449 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.