↓ Skip to main content

Biodegradation of mono-hydroxylated PCBs by Burkholderia xenovorans

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology Letters, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Biodegradation of mono-hydroxylated PCBs by Burkholderia xenovorans
Published in
Biotechnology Letters, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10529-012-1037-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Three hydroxylated derivatives of PCBs, 2'-hydroxy-4-chlorobiphenyl (2'-OH-4-CB), 3'-hydroxy-4-chlorobiphenyl (3'-OH-4-CB), and 4'-hydroxy-4-chlorobiphenyl (4'-OH-4-CB), were transformed by the PCB degrader, Burkholderia xenovorans. When the bacterium was growing on biphenyl (biphenyl pathway-inducing conditions), all three hydroxylated isomers were transformed. However, only 2'-OH-4-CB was transformed by the bacterium growing on succinate (conditions non-inductive of the biphenyl pathway). Gene expression analyses showed a strong induction of key genes of the biphenyl pathway (bph) when cells were grown on biphenyl, which is consistent with the transformation of the three isomers by biphenyl-grown cells. When cells were grown on succinate, only exposure to 2'-OH-4-CB resulted in expression of biphenyl pathway genes, which suggests that this isomer was capable of inducing the biphenyl pathway. These results provide the first evidence that bacteria are able to metabolize PCB derivatives hydroxylated on the non-chlorinated ring.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 23%
Engineering 4 18%
Environmental Science 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2012.
All research outputs
#22,271,113
of 27,264,936 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Letters
#925
of 1,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,898
of 191,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Letters
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,264,936 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.