| Title |
Excess mortality in the first COVID pandemic peak: cross-sectional analyses of the impact of age, sex, ethnicity, household size, and long-term conditions in people of known SARS-Cov-2 status in England
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x713393 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Joy, FD Richard Hobbs, Jamie Lopez Bernal, Julian Sherlock, Gayatri Amirthalingam, Dylan McGagh, Oluwafunmi Akinyemi, Rachel Byford, Gavin Dabrera, Jienchi Dorward, Joanna Ellis, Filipa Ferreira, Nicholas Jones, Jason Oke, Cecilia Okusi, Brian D Nicholson, Mary Ramsay, James P Sheppard, Mary Sinnathamby, Maria Zambon, Gary Howsam, John Williams, Simon de Lusignan |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 23 | 56% |
| Ireland | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 56% |
| Scientists | 8 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 64 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 70 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,073,650
of 34,325,395 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#428
of 5,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,370
of 471,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#5
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,325,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.