This study evaluated the accuracy of plain radiographs and computerized tomography (CT) in assessing juvenile Tillaux fractures of the distal tibia. A simulated Tillaux fracture was made in four cadaver specimens and displaced 0, 1, 2, 3, and 5 mm. Plain radiographs and CT were performed on each specimen at each amount of displacement, and the results were compared with the actual amount of displacement present. Plain radiographs and CT were accurate within 1 mm in depicting the actual fracture displacement about 50% of the time. CT was more sensitive than plain radiographs in detecting fractures with >2 mm of displacement. Fracture displacement of >2 mm is generally considered an indication for fracture reduction. Because of its sensitivity in detecting fractures displaced >2 mm, CT is the preferred imaging modality in the assessment of juvenile Tillaux fractures.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,745,521
of 28,766,646 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
#331
of 2,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,870
of 48,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,766,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,741 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.
