↓ Skip to main content

Childhood Placement in Special Education and Adult Well-Being

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Special Education, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 310)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Childhood Placement in Special Education and Adult Well-Being
Published in
The Journal of Special Education, January 2016
DOI 10.1177/0022466915624413
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The present study investigates the relationship between childhood placement in special education and adult well-being among 1,377 low-income, minority children participating in the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Roughly 16% of the sample received special education services in grades 1-8. After accounting for sociodemographic factors and early academic achievement, children receiving special education services tended to have lower rates of high school completion and fewer years of education, as well as greater rates of incarceration, substance misuse, and depression. Eighth grade academic achievement significantly mediated the association between childhood placement in special education and adult well-being outcomes. The study contributes to the literature by providing support for a pathway from childhood special education placement to adult outcomes among an inner-city minority cohort.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 38 33%
Psychology 15 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Mathematics 5 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 34 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2026.
All research outputs
#4,570,993
of 34,139,555 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Special Education
#33
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,103
of 448,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Special Education
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,139,555 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them