↓ Skip to main content

Can coral skeletal-bound nitrogen isotopes be used as a proxy for past bleaching?

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can coral skeletal-bound nitrogen isotopes be used as a proxy for past bleaching?
Published in
Biogeochemistry, October 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10533-020-00706-2
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 4 15%
Researcher 4 15%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 12%
Chemistry 2 8%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2020.
All research outputs
#20,673,376
of 32,403,885 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#908
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,719
of 460,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,403,885 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.