↓ Skip to main content

Balancing transferability and complexity of species distribution models for rare species conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Diversity & Distributions, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Balancing transferability and complexity of species distribution models for rare species conservation
Published in
Diversity & Distributions, October 2020
DOI 10.1111/ddi.13174
Authors

Nolan A. Helmstetter, Courtney J. Conway, Bryan S. Stevens, Amanda R. Goldberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 35%
Environmental Science 17 27%
Unspecified 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#6,217,132
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Diversity & Distributions
#851
of 1,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,211
of 439,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diversity & Distributions
#26
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.