You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Selection of Oncogenic Mutant Clones in Normal Human Skin Varies with Body Site
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1092 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanna C Fowler, Charlotte King, Christopher Bryant, Michael W J Hall, Roshan Sood, Swee Hoe Ong, Eleanor Earp, David Fernandez-Antoran, Jonas Koeppel, Stefan C Dentro, David Shorthouse, Amer Durrani, Kate Fife, Edward Rytina, Doreen Milne, Amit Roshan, Krishnaa Mahububani, Kourosh Saeb-Parsy, Benjamin A Hall, Moritz Gerstung, Philip H Jones |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 18% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 30 | 48% |
| Members of the public | 24 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,275,942
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#637
of 4,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,318
of 530,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#47
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.