| Title |
In Vitro Evaluation of a Vibrating-Mesh Nebulizer Repeatedly Use over 28 Days
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutics, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3390/pharmaceutics12100971 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui-Ling Lin, Chi-Shuo Chen, James B. Fink, Guo-Hao Lee, Chun-Wei Huang, Jui-Chi Chen, Zi Yi Chiang |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Ireland | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2020.
All research outputs
#16,935,077
of 27,789,879 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutics
#2,250
of 7,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,226
of 442,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutics
#98
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,789,879 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,163 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.