You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nineteenth Century Mercury: Hazard to Wading Birds and Cormorants of the Carson River, Nevada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecotoxicology, August 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1016327602656 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles J. Henny, Elwood F. Hill, David J. Hoffman, Marilyn G. Spalding, Robert A. Grove |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 21% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ecotoxicology
#172
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,333
of 48,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecotoxicology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them