| Title |
Disease risk analysis in sea turtles: A baseline study to inform conservation efforts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0230760 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Narges Mashkour, Karina Jones, Sara Kophamel, Teresa Hipolito, Shamim Ahasan, Grant Walker, Richard Jakob-Hoff, Maxine Whittaker, Mark Hamann, Ian Bell, Jennifer Elliman, Leigh Owens, Claire Saladin, Jose Luis Crespo-Picazo, Brett Gardner, Aswini Leela Loganathan, Rachel Bowater, Erina Young, David Robinson, Warren Baverstock, David Blyde, Duan March, Maryam Eghbali, Maryam Mohammadi, Daniela Freggi, Jane Giliam, Mike Hale, Nicholas Nicolle, Kevin Spiby, Daphne Wrobel, Mariluz Parga, Asghar Mobaraki, Rupika Rajakaruna, Kevin P. Hyland, Mark Read, Ellen Ariel |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 82 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 11 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 22% |
| Unknown | 87 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,250,650
of 30,077,155 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#59,863
of 207,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,410
of 435,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,023
of 2,983 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,077,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,983 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.