↓ Skip to main content

Fragmented restrictions, fractured resonances: grassroots responses to Covid-19 in China

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Asian Studies, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Fragmented restrictions, fractured resonances: grassroots responses to Covid-19 in China
Published in
Critical Asian Studies, October 2020
DOI 10.1080/14672715.2020.1834868
Authors

Yao Song, Tianyang Liu, Xiangyang Wang, Tianru Guan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Master 6 14%
Lecturer 5 12%
Researcher 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,495,303
of 24,945,754 outputs
Outputs from Critical Asian Studies
#72
of 344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,335
of 427,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Asian Studies
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,945,754 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.