↓ Skip to main content

Depression and Co-Occurring Health Determinants of Hispanic Men With HIV Infection in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region: A Pilot Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Social Service Research, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Depression and Co-Occurring Health Determinants of Hispanic Men With HIV Infection in the U.S.-Mexico Border Region: A Pilot Study
Published in
Journal of Social Service Research, March 2016
DOI 10.1080/01488376.2015.1112872
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

HIV infection among Hispanic men is a public health concern. Certain factors have been identified that may contribute to the high rates of HIV infection among Hispanic men such as migration, acculturation, poverty, and depression. Hispanic men with HIV infection are at risk for additional co-occurring health issues. Given limited research few studies have focused specifically on Hispanic men with HIV infection residing in a U.S.-Mexico border community. This pilot study surveyed participants (n = 39), to better understand co-occurrence of health determinants, especially depression among Hispanic men with HIV infection. The study's findings indicate that clinicians need to be aware that factors may influence depression among people with Hispanic men with HIV infection. Clinicians also need awareness of the impact of depression on adherence to HIV care and treatment among Hispanic men with HIV infection. More research is needed to explore the relationship of HIV-related stigma, HIV disclosure, social support, and depression among Hispanic men with HIV infection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 25%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2016.
All research outputs
#16,754,527
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Social Service Research
#179
of 267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,405
of 316,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Social Service Research
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.