↓ Skip to main content

Effect of short-term carbohydrate overfeeding and long-term weight loss on liver fat in overweight humans

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
55 X users
facebook
19 Facebook pages
reddit
9 Redditors
video
10 YouTube creators
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of short-term carbohydrate overfeeding and long-term weight loss on liver fat in overweight humans
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, September 2012
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.112.038695
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 225 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 10%
Student > Master 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Other 53 22%
Unknown 57 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Unspecified 10 4%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 63 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2025.
All research outputs
#605,415
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,403
of 15,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,757
of 224,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#19
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.