↓ Skip to main content

An Analytical Approach for Estimating Fossil Record and Diversification Events in Sharks, Skates and Rays

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
An Analytical Approach for Estimating Fossil Record and Diversification Events in Sharks, Skates and Rays
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0044632
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Modern selachians and their supposed sister group (hybodont sharks) have a long and successful evolutionary history. Yet, although selachian remains are considered relatively common in the fossil record in comparison with other marine vertebrates, little is known about the quality of their fossil record. Similarly, only a few works based on specific time intervals have attempted to identify major events that marked the evolutionary history of this group.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Costa Rica 1 1%
Unknown 75 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 21%
Student > Master 16 20%
Researcher 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Other 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 40%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 26%
Environmental Science 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 14 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2025.
All research outputs
#3,757,217
of 34,640,154 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#39,509
of 225,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,747
of 224,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#719
of 4,686 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,640,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,686 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.