| Title |
β-Coronaviruses Use Lysosomes for Egress Instead of the Biosynthetic Secretory Pathway
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.039 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sourish Ghosh, Teegan A Dellibovi-Ragheb, Adeline Kerviel, Eowyn Pak, Qi Qiu, Matthew Fisher, Peter M Takvorian, Christopher Bleck, Victor W Hsu, Anthony R Fehr, Stanley Perlman, Sooraj R Achar, Marco R Straus, Gary R Whittaker, Cornelis A M de Haan, John Kehrl, Grégoire Altan-Bonnet, Nihal Altan-Bonnet |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 447 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 100 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 3% |
| India | 13 | 3% |
| Spain | 12 | 3% |
| France | 12 | 3% |
| Germany | 8 | 2% |
| Mexico | 7 | 2% |
| Japan | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 96 | 21% |
| Unknown | 173 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 304 | 68% |
| Scientists | 119 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 1% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 666 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 666 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 14% |
| Researcher | 83 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 82 | 12% |
| Unknown | 262 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 153 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 65 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 3% |
| Other | 68 | 10% |
| Unknown | 287 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 576. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2026.
All research outputs
#52,155
of 34,560,275 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#353
of 19,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,485
of 473,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#20
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,560,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.