| Title |
Emerging Standards and the Hybrid Model for Organizing Scientific Events During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (Highwire), October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1017/dmp.2020.406 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Hanaei, Amirhossein Takian, Reza Majdzadeh, Christopher Ryan Maboloc, Igor Grossmann, Orlando Gomes, Milos Milosevic, Manoj Gupta, Alireza A. Shamshirsaz, Amine Harbi, Amer M. Burhan, Lucina Q. Uddin, Arutha Kulasinghe, Chi-Ming Lam, Seeram Ramakrishna, Abass Alavi, Jan L Nouwen, Tommaso Dorigo, Michael Schreiber, Ajith Abraham, Natalya Shelkovaya, Wojtek Krysztofiak, Majid Ebrahimi Warkiani, Frank Sellke, Shuji Ogino, Francisco J. Barba, Serge Brand, Clara Vasconcelos, Deepak B. Salunke, Nima Rezaei |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Austria | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 262 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 11% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 116 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 11 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 126 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,641,420
of 34,378,656 outputs
Outputs from Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (Highwire)
#355
of 1,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,476
of 472,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness (Highwire)
#10
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,378,656 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.