| Title |
Exuberant fibroblast activity compromises lung function via ADAMTS4
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-020-2877-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David F. Boyd, E. Kaitlynn Allen, Adrienne G. Randolph, Xi-zhi J. Guo, Yunceng Weng, Catherine J. Sanders, Resha Bajracharya, Natalie K. Lee, Clifford S. Guy, Peter Vogel, Wenda Guan, Yimin Li, Xiaoqing Liu, Tanya Novak, Margaret M. Newhams, Thomas P. Fabrizio, Nicholas Wohlgemuth, Peter M. Mourani, Thomas N. Wight, Stacey Schultz-Cherry, Stephania A. Cormier, Kathryn Shaw-Saliba, Andrew Pekosz, Richard E. Rothman, Kuan-Fu Chen, Zifeng Yang, Richard J. Webby, Nanshan Zhong, Jeremy Chase Crawford, Paul G. Thomas |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
An error occurred while generating this chart. Please try again later.
No score history available for this output yet. Please try again later.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 221 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 70 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 6% |
| Australia | 11 | 5% |
| France | 8 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 72 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 115 | 52% |
| Scientists | 82 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 305 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 17% |
| Researcher | 47 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 13% |
| Unknown | 121 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 54 | 18% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 41 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 125 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2026.
All research outputs
#346,411
of 34,586,309 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#17,290
of 117,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,763
of 473,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#341
of 899 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,586,309 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 117,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 899 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.