↓ Skip to main content

Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-9-65
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Stroke is the most common cause of disability in the developed world and can severely degrade walking function. Robot-driven gait therapy can provide assistance to patients during training and offers a number of advantages over other forms of therapy. These potential benefits do not, however, seem to have been fully realised as of yet in clinical practice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Switzerland 3 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 363 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 19%
Student > Master 71 19%
Researcher 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 7%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 72 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 145 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 8%
Neuroscience 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 2%
Other 32 9%
Unknown 90 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,738,224
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#778
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,097
of 187,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.